LinkedIn post 03-04-2026

๐„๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐š๐ง๐ ๐…๐ข๐ง๐š๐ง๐œ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐•๐ข๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐†๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐ง๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž ๐‡๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž

Across Europe, the energy landscape for greenhouse horticulture is shifting rapidly.

Carbon pricing, grid constraints and evolving regulatory frameworks are already influencing how new projects are designed and financed.

Financial institutions are responding accordingly. Increasingly, long term investment cases are being assessed against their ability to operate with reduced or no reliance on natural gas.

This places pressure on traditional combined heat and power systems, which have historically underpinned both energy supply and COโ‚‚ enrichment in commercial greenhouses.

At the same time, transitioning to low or zero emission heating is not straightforward. Solutions such as geothermal networks, large scale heat pumps or district energy systems require significant upfront investment and depend heavily on local infrastructure and policy support.

The result is a more complex decision space. The question is not simply whether natural gas will be phased out, but how quickly projects can transition while maintaining operational stability and financial viability.

At VEK, energy strategy is treated as a core design parameter. Heating, cooling, COโ‚‚ strategy and grid interaction are engineered together from the outset, allowing projects to adapt to changing policy and market conditions over time.