LinkedIn post 30-01-2026
๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต-๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป๐ต๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ๐
In most high-tech greenhouses, energy is not only one of the largest operating costs, it is also one of the few parameters that can be structurally improved through design.
Across colder and temperate climates, heating and climate control typically account for around 70โ80% of total energy use, with electricity and other fuels making up the remainder.
Well-considered climate strategies can materially change this profile:
– ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ can reduce heating demand by approximately 20โ40% or more, depending on climate and configuration.
– ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ-๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐น ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ฒ๐ that combine natural and hybrid approaches can further reduce electrical demand for fans and cooling equipment.
– ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต-๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ allow facilities to move toward near-net-zero operation while maintaining stable growing conditions.
The lesson is straightforward: a greenhouse that appears efficient on paper can still lock in high and volatile energy costs if climate and energy strategy are not engineered into the concept from the beginning.
At VEK, energy performance is treated as a core design parameter, not an add-on. Heating, cooling, ventilation, screening and potential renewable options are integrated into a single system model so that production, cost and resilience can be managed together over the full life of the facility.