LinkedIn post 29-11-2025
๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐จ ๐๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป๐ต๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป
EU climate policy is reshaping what a modern greenhouse or controlled-environment facility must achieve.
Design briefs that once focused solely on yield now must account for lifetime energy performance, input efficiency, and demonstrable environmental impact.
In new projects, five themes are moving earlier in the conversation:
โข ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ โ Demand, flexibility, and how facilities interact with local grids.
โข ๐๐ป๐ฝ๐๐๐ โ Water, substrates and fertilisers, along with their embedded footprint
โข ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ โ Operating predictably under more volatile climate and market conditions
โข ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ โ Being able to validate environmental and operational performance over time
โข ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ โ Aligning technology with local constraints and long-term cost structures
Policy instruments differ across Europe, but the direction is consistent: Facilities being designed today will operate under far stricter climate, reporting, and performance requirements than those applied at the point of construction.
For anyone planning new greenhouse or CEA infrastructure, the brief is shifting, and the technical questions need to shift with it.
How is this influencing the way you frame the early design brief for upcoming greenhouse or CEA projects?